Workgroup on Solidarity Socio-Economy





   
pronto disponible

  November 20, 2008
Workgroup on Solidarity Socio-Economy Social Money

Vision of an integrated Solidarity Socio-Economy
Indicators
Fair Trade
Solidarity Finance
Social Money
Women and Economy
Societal Responsibility
International Regulations
Environmental Justice, Ecological Debt and Sustainability
A Strategic Agenda for the 21st Century

Asian Forum for Solidarity Economy
Manila (Philippines)
October 17-20, 2007
Social money in Korea
By Yasuyuki Hirota

LETS (Local Exchange Trading System) and other sorts of social money are operational in Korea too, although the language has been the barrier which made it difficult for non-Koreans to see how they are put into practice. I stayed in South Korea from Nov 29 (Monday) to Dec 04 (Saturday) and visited projects in Seoul and Taejon to establish contacts with them. And I owe a great deal of this report to Ms. Kanako Taguchi, a Japanese exchange student currently at Yonsei Univ., for translation and contacts. I really appreciate her contribution.

LETS was introduced to Korea for the first time by an article in the magazine "Green Review", although it remained almost unknown to the general public. It was Minaisa Club, a not-for-profit organisation in search of alternative lifestyles, which was virtually the first promoter of social money to Koreans. This club came to know about the idea of LETS in November 1997 when the whole country was suffering from the monetary crisis, wrote an article about projects in Great Britain for a magazine it published for members, and started the first LETS in Korea in March 1998. This trial was reported by Chosun Ilbo (Korea's largest newspaper), with inquiries mainly from NGOs, the public administration and ordinary people. Among others, NGOs were the most dynamic actors, including representative cases such as Hanbat LETS (Taejon) and the Green Monetary System (nationwide).

Mr. Lee told me, during my interview, that projects undertaken by the public administration are organized as a personal project by one officer rather than as its official project (which is commonplace in Japan) and tend to stop when the person in charge moves to another section (in Japan such experiences become inactive while the public sector finishes its involvement). This is a huge difference between Korea and Japan where I live.

In 1999 LETS throughout Korea worked together to submit a report under the name of "national network of Pumasi" (pumasi means "mutual aid" in Korean and is used widely to stand for "LETS" too) when they were asked to do so by an institution of the Korean government, although the current regime shows no interest at all in LETS. Mr. Lee also said that the Minaisa Club LETS is not active currently, even though there are some possibilities to revive it in 2005 by linking this system with self-employed workers or new entrepreneurs.

The most active case in Korea is Hanbat LETS at Taejon. It started with 70 people in February 2000; the membership has grown to 550 now, of which 100 or 150 are active traders. The LETS office shares its building with a medical cooperative founded by its members, with its drugstore and clinic accepting partial payment in LETS. It is in close contact with organic farmers in the suburbs of Taejon too who partially accept LETS. Members register all the transactions openly on the website, assuring global transparency as everybody can check the trade record.

This LETS started as a grass-root initiative with no subsidy at all from the administration, although it gave some financial aid in 2002 and 2003 to print bills. These bills, although still available today, are only seldom used nowadays after it introduced an online message board system from Gojan LETS at Ansan, in the suburbs of Seoul. It also offers an "ambulant movie" service for the poor and delivery in LETS of vegetables which were refused due to some defects not in the quality of food but in appearance (small onions or curved cucumbers, for instance).

Another famous experience is the Green Monetary System by the Green Network which promotes organic farming. This is a trial to link organic farmers with consumers as follows: organic shops get some Green Currency at Green Network (called "Shinsi" [divine market] as it was the name of the barter fair in ancient Korea) office in exchange for Won when they are open and spend Won for several transactions. In this way Shinsi financed Won are passed on to organic farmers, helping them financially. Bills equivalent to 100 million Wons (US$100,000) are printed by Korea Minting and Security Printing Corporation, the same factory which makes Korean Won bills, but they haven't been put into circulation for several reasons.

I visited Gojan LETS, Ansan and Tool/Technic Bank at Chung-ang University Social Welfare Center (a place for children), Seoul. Gojan LETS is located in the suburbs of Seoul and members gather once a month to register their transactions on top of holding markets or exchange news. The Tool/Technic bank was run by those who were involved with this center, such as parents of children who stay there or student staff, but people gave up trading when some people accumulated too many LETS points without any intention of spending.

I observed that the dynamism of LETS relied on the Internet or the so-called "3.8.6 generation". Korea provided state-of-the-art Internet-connection technology to people after the IMF crisis in 1997 and I found out that this advanced infrastructure (even more advanced than in Japan!) greatly changed people's life and the way they communicate with each other. Some non-Korean LETS websites have message boards too but I've never seen any site as active as Korean ones. And the fact that several LETS are run mainly by the "3.8.6" generation (people who struggled for the democratization of South Korea in the 1980s when they were students) appears quite significant for the further development of this movement.

I asked some questions about their knowledge of projects throughout the world and they seem to have little idea of what is happening in this field outside their country, except for LETS. I'm sure, however, that further activities will develop if social money experts from other countries keep in close touch with them, since they were quite interested when I told them about projects in other countries. Miguel Yasuyuki Hirota
mig@olccjp.net

- japanese version: http://www.janjan.jp/world/0412/0412081408/1.php
- korean version: http://www.chosun.com/economy/news/200410/200410280366.html

 
   

top of page ^


Awele: Reap what you share
powered by Awele